{"id":88,"date":"2012-10-04T22:14:08","date_gmt":"2012-10-04T22:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/?p=88"},"modified":"2012-10-04T22:14:49","modified_gmt":"2012-10-04T22:14:49","slug":"using-5c-to-investigate-promoter-enhancer-interactions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/2012\/10\/04\/using-5c-to-investigate-promoter-enhancer-interactions\/","title":{"rendered":"Using 5C to investigate TSS-enhancer interactions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v489\/n7414\/full\/nature11279.html\">recent paper<\/a> from the <a href=\"http:\/\/my5c.umassmed.edu\/welcome\/welcome.php\">Dekker lab<\/a>, released as part of the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/encode\/#\/threads\">ENCODE<\/a>\u00a0project,\u00a0describes 5C, a new tool for analyzing three-dimensional looping interactions in chromosomes at unprecedented resolution. 5C, which stands for chromosome conformation capture carbon copy, is capable of describing interactions between promoter regions and distal regulatory regions, providing a new clue for connecting regulatory regions to the genes that they regulate. This technology is still limited by the number of experiments required to investigate large regions of the genome; in this study, they examined only 1% of the genome, corresponding to the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v447\/n7146\/full\/nature05874.html\"> ENCODE pilot regions<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This study is motivated by the difficulty in assigning regulatory regions to target genes. They used genome annotations from another <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v489\/n7414\/full\/nature11247.html\">ENCODE paper<\/a> to divide the genome into enhancers, promoters, CTCF, and other sections, and investigated the three-dimensional relationships between TSS and these regions. Unlike promoters, distal enhancers do not necessarily correspond to the nearest gene. This paper finds that only 7% of looping interactions are between an enhancer and the nearest TSS, and 22% of looping interactions are between an enhancer and the nearest active TSS. This supports the idea that genes within the &#8216;loop&#8217; section of the chromosome structure may not be regulated by the enhancer that regulates a gene at the &#8216;narrow&#8217; part of the loop.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/files\/2012\/10\/Slide12.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-93\" title=\"Slide1\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/files\/2012\/10\/Slide12-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/files\/2012\/10\/Slide12-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/files\/2012\/10\/Slide12-400x300.jpg 400w, https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/files\/2012\/10\/Slide12.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, they found that enhancers between enhancer, promoter, and CTCF regions were most common about 120kb upstream of the TSS for a gene. Less surprisingly, they found that TSS with more 5C interactions are more highly expressed. Furthermore, the 3d interaction network is tissue-specific, although this is more true for TSS-promoter and TSS-enhancer interactions than TSS-CTCF. 5C is still far from perfect &#8211; in particular, we still do not have a 5C map of the entire genome. However, this data helps fill in the gaps from more traditional 3C, 4C, and Hi-C experiments, and provides novel insight into the role of distal enhancers in gene regulation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent paper from the Dekker lab, released as part of the\u00a0ENCODE\u00a0project,\u00a0describes 5C, a new tool for analyzing three-dimensional looping interactions in chromosomes at unprecedented resolution. 5C, which stands for chromosome conformation capture carbon copy, is capable of describing interactions &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/2012\/10\/04\/using-5c-to-investigate-promoter-enhancer-interactions\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10,11],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":97,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88\/revisions\/97"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.discovery.wisc.edu\/compsysbio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}